The Retreat
April 18, 2024, 08:30:07 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the Retreat.

 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Why we no longer win wars

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Why we no longer win wars  (Read 107 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
MagicM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2436



« on: October 29, 2013, 07:50:09 am »

From a local political blog (as we finally start withdraw most of our troops from Afghanistan in 2014):

Anyone wondering why the west can no longer win wars, just listen to former (Australian) Chief of the Army, Peter Leahy, talking about Afghanistan today on the ABC:

PETER LEAHY: Yep. It was worth it. As I’ve said, it gave them a chance. I think it was also worth it because we have introduced a little bit of those values, a little bit of how you can do things. We’ve given girls an opportunity to go to school. We’ve opened up commerce. We have talked about getting rid of corruption. We’ve talked about legitimacy. So I think we should be proud of what we’ve achieved.

Did we win the war Pete? Remember that old fashioned concept called Victory? I’m not a big fan of Douglas MacArthur, but he was right about one thing: There is no substitute for victory.

But I also think we should take some lessons out of it. One of the first lessons is around the war aims. I just have a niggling fear that we didn’t quite get the balance right. We did too much security with the Army and not enough aid and development with those other agencies of government. So I think that’s the first lesson.

The Army is not the Benevolent Society you numptie. It is there to win the land battle in order to destroy the enemy. Once the Taliban is destroyed, all those other things can follow. Except we didn’t do that so now we will be handing the schools that we built over to the Taliban. What do you think they will do with them Pete me old mate?

To me it’s not so much the decision to go to war, but the decision about staying at war. And how do we adjust our war aims? How do we reconsider our exit strategy?

We adjust our war aims to defeating the enemy. Then the ‘exit strategy’ is simple: Victory. I know it’s an old fashioned concept but it works its arse off. Perhaps we can try it next time. Peter Leahy was the first Chief of the Army who never went to war. It shows.

The only thing ‘worth it’ to come from our commitment to Afghanistan, apart from killing plenty of jihadists and combat experience for the army, is that the Chief of the Army in a dozen or so years will have led troops in combat. Unless, of course by then it will be woman appointed by quota.

Report Spam   Logged

“Beauties in vain their pretty eyes may roll; charms strike the sight, but merit wins the soul.”  Alexander Pope

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Artiste
artist extraordinaire
Hero Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 9354


« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2013, 12:01:36 pm »

That is a great statement!

Any more about this ?


Au revoir, keep care,
hugs!

Order now for Christmas your unique painting this one or have one created for you: ontart@yahoo.ca
www.langdonart.com

Pour Noel, tu commandes maintenant ces peintures ou tu fais un ordre pour peinture unique pour toi: ontart@yahoo.ca
www.langdonart.com
Report Spam   Logged

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy